Issue Nº.001 — Spring 2026
Cloud Transcoding Quarterly
Vol. 8 / Compare

vs the
meter.

— The short version

AWS Elemental MediaConvert is the per-minute incumbent: upload to the cloud, pay per normalized minute of output, forever. TRNSCODE is the opposite bet — a flat monthly ceiling on hardware your building already owns.

— Side by side

The differences
that decide it.

Both columns describe what actually ships — theirs from what they publish, ours from the product. Nothing guessed, nothing padded.

TRNSCODEAWS MediaConvert
What it isSoftware you run: a master and a worker fleet on your machinesA managed transcoding service inside AWS regions
Your mediaStays on your SAN, behind your firewall — no upload step existsUploads to S3; outputs come back over the wire
Cost modelFlat: $0 (Solo) to $999/mo (Studio Plus, unlimited workers)Per normalized minute of output — $0.012/min first bracket, Professional tier, US East (4K ≤30fps counts 4×)
150 hours of 4K a monthStudio 25 — $249 flat~$432 at the published floor rate, before HEVC/quality multipliers
Next monthSame flat fee, same fleetThe meter starts at zero and runs again
Storage & egressNone billed — it's your LANS3 storage and data egress billed separately
Elastic scaleYour hardware is the ceiling — add a box, get throughputEffectively unlimited burst capacity — their genuine strength
Editorial workflowsEXR · OCIO · ACES ingest, NLE round-trip (Avid, Premiere, FCP, Resolve), dailies and reviewBuilt for OTT/broadcast delivery pipelines, not editorial round-trips
Job evidence11 verifiers score every job; the evidence ships with the deliverableCloudWatch metrics and job status; QC is your own workflow
— Candor

Where AWS wins.

If your load is a spiky, planet-scale OTT pipeline with no hardware and no wish to own any, an elastic meter is the right shape — nobody out-bursts AWS. TRNSCODE's case begins where post-production actually lives: the footage is already in the building, the machines are already paid for, and the meter never stops being a meter.

— The honest fork

Pick by the room
you run.

Choose AWS MediaConvert if…

You have no hardware and want none, your volume spikes unpredictably by orders of magnitude, your sources already live in S3, and per-title cloud cost is an acceptable line item.

Choose TRNSCODE if…

Your footage is on a SAN under NDA, your building is full of machines that sleep half the day, your monthly volume is steady enough that a flat fee beats a meter — and you want evidence, not hope, attached to every deliverable.

If AWS MediaConvert ships something that makes a row here outdated, tell us — info@trnscode.com — and the row gets fixed. These pages are only worth keeping if both columns stay true.

— Questions

Asked before
switching.

Is TRNSCODE cheaper than AWS MediaConvert?

At steady post-production volume, usually — 150 hours of 4K a month is roughly $432 at MediaConvert's published floor rate versus $249 flat on Studio 25, and the gap widens with HEVC, quality modes and volume. At near-zero or wildly spiky volume, the meter can win. The math section on our pricing page shows the arithmetic so you can run your own numbers.

Can TRNSCODE match cloud scale?

It scales to the hardware you give it — every box you add is throughput, and Studio Plus removes the worker cap entirely. What it deliberately does not do is rent you burst capacity: if you need a thousand machines for one weekend, that is AWS's game.

Do they solve the same problem?

They overlap on 'video goes in, encoded video comes out' and diverge on everything around it. MediaConvert is a delivery-pipeline service; TRNSCODE is a post-production tool — editorial proxies, EXR ingest with colour management, review gates, and verification evidence on every job, running where the footage already lives.

All comparisons →

— Start encoding

Point it at a folder.
Get your frames back.

Install the master, join a worker, submit a job. Self-hosted and free to run on hardware you already own.

Self-hosted · your hardware, your network